Key to evaluating core international equity benchmarks is an understanding of the country exposures offered. Developed and emerging market country classification differences between index providers may lead to notable geographic exposure differences across market segments. One of the most meaningful instances of this involves South Korea, which S&P DJI has classified as a developed market since 2001, while MSCI continues to classify the country as an emerging market. READ MORE
Similar Posts:
- Why the MSCI Emerging Markets Index Has Some BIG Problems (WSJ)
- Buying Stocks in Asia: The Ultimate Guide (InvestAsian)
- Mirae Asset Securities’ Korean Stock Picks (June 2023)
- Three Reasons Why South Korea is Our Gold Medalist (Robeco)
- S&W’s McGrath: Emerging Markets Are at the Perfect Entry Point (FE Trustnet)
- South Korea: A Shining Example of Emerging Market Leadership (Franklin Templeton)
- On Growth, Exports and Supply Chain Diversification: Making the Case for South Korean Equities (Franklin Templeton)
- GAM’s Love: Emerging Markets Might Double Your Money Over Four Years (FE Trustnet)
- Return of Short-Selling to Test South Korea’s Small Investors (Nikkei Asia)
- Hungary, Poland, Mexico and South Korea Poised to Handle a Pull Back in US Monetary Stimulus (WealthManagement.com)
- South Korea Facing Worst Labor Market Crisis Since 1997 (Nikkei Asia)
- Mirae Asset Securities’ Korean Stock Picks (May 2023)
- Bloomberg’s Misery Index’s Least Miserable Emerging Markets
- Looking Past the Hang-Ups for Asia’s Smartphone Industry (Franklin Templeton)
- Understanding China’s Economic and Market Developments: Managing China’s Transition into Global Benchmarks (FTSE Russell)
