To undercut initial high bidders, crowds of institutional investors often offered lower IPO price quotations that were almost or exactly the same in unison, taking advantage of rules in which at least the highest 10% of total quotes should be rejected. The September rule change cut the percentage to no more than the highest 3%, reducing the effectiveness of previous bid tactics and allowing companies to set loftier IPO prices to raise more money. READ MORE
Similar Posts:
- Didi Ekes Out 1% Gain After New York IPO Pop Fizzles (Nikkei Asia)
- Surge in Bond Issuance By Chinese Firms to Fund Capex and Global Expansion (The Asset)
- All the Emperor’s Men: How Xi Jinping Became China’s Unrivalled Leader — and How he Plans to Expand His Power Base (Financial Times)
- Chinese Tech IPOs in US Rebound After Two-Month Lull (Nikkei Asia)
- DouYu Ends First Day at Its Offer Price in $775 Million IPO (Bloomberg)
- Is China Still Uninvestable? A Conversation with Navis Jockey Fund (SumZero)
- Perspective Global Equity: Why China A, Why Now? (William Blair)
- Chinese Tech Stocks Down But Not Out As Sentiment Shifts (FA)
- Sustained Growth Slowdown in China Would Spill Over to Asia-Pacific Region and Beyond (Moody’s Talk)
- BNP Paribas’ Chi Lo: Patient Investors Should Build Up China Exposure Now (CMN)
- Five Misconceptions About China’s Stock Markets (KraneShares)
- Hundreds of IPOs Stuck in Logjam Amid Tightened Regulatory Reviews (Caixin)
- Why China’s Stock Market Tumble is Giving India’s a Lift (Nikkei Asia)
- India and China Emerging as Startup Hot Spots (Nikkei Asian Review)
- TOP Financial Group (NASDAQ: TOP): Hong Kong’s Latest Crazy Meme Stock
